Syllabus for EDL-670
TECHNOLOGY FOR INSTRUCTION AND ADMINISTRATION
Technology for Instruction and Administration focuses on the key role of the school principal as a leader in the selection, use, and evaluation of instructional technology. Students are encouraged to think critically about technology, both in its role in the teaching-learning process as well as in its role in school management. NPBEA 1, 2, 3; NJDOE 1, 2, 3).
After successfully completing this course, you should be able to:
CO1 Evaluate computer hardware and software programs commonly used in a school setting according to given evaluation criteria.
CO2 Illustrate at least seven ways in which technology may be used in the instructional process, identify the associated hardware and software products that can be used to achieve these ends, and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of each.
CO3 Identify several examples of web-based learning, including distance learning, and discuss how these can be used to increase school and district instructional options and improve student achievement.
CO4 Describe and use several administrative applications, notably database management systems and spreadsheets, and identify uses for specialized applications such as test scoring statistical software, automatic calling systems, and energy management systems.
CO5 Integrate the essential components of the planning process with the technologies that can be used to address each component.
CO6 Identify the key components of an effective staff development plan for teachers and apply them to support the implementation of technology in a school.
You will need the following materials to do the work of the course. The required textbooks are available from the University's textbook supplier, MBS Direct.
As a capstone experience in the Educational Leadership program, you will prepare an electronic portfolio that demonstrates your incremental achievement of the program standards. Each course in the program helps you to identify artifacts to place in your portfolio on completion of the course. To this end, you are required to purchase an electronic portfolio registration code upon your entry into the Master of Arts in Educational Leadership program. Basic directions for purchasing access to and using your electronic portfolio are posted within the Educational Leadership Students Organization (online community).
Technology for Instruction and Administration is a three-credit online graduate course, consisting of six modules. Modules include an overview, topics, learning objectives, study materials, and activities. Module titles and topics are listed below.
Uses of computer technology for administration and instruction
Criteria for acquiring computer hardware
Criteria for evaluating computer software
Instructional applications: evolution, research results, new and future uses
Multimedia: hardware and software, instructional uses
The Internet: evolution, World Wide Web, applications
Distance learning: past and current technologies, design considerations, course management systems, educational programs
Database management systems
Data-driven decision making
Social planning model and its use in technology planning
Planning and managing computer facilities: space, personnel, security, maintenance
Financial planning: cost effectiveness, budgeting
Program design and techniques
Modules 1, 3, and 5 contain four key course activities; Module 4 requires you to complete two software projects; and Module 6 includes a staff development project. See sections below for further information about these activities and projects, including evaluation rubrics.
For your formal work in the course, you are required to participate in online discussion forums and complete four key activities, two software projects, and a staff development project.
Consult the Course Calendar for assignment due dates.
Each module in the course has one or more discussion forums. All discussion forums take place asynchronously.
Online discussions provide an opportunity for you to interact with your classmates. During this aspect of the course, you respond to prompts that assist you in developing your ideas, you share those ideas with your classmates, and you comment on their posts. Discussion forum interactions promote development of a community of learners, critical thinking, and exploratory learning.
Most discussion activities contain several questions. Be sure your posting addresses all of them. Some discussion forums direct you to post a course activity for classmates' comments.
Please participate in online discussions as you would in constructive face-to-face discussions. You are expected to post well-reasoned and thoughtful reflections for each item, making reference, as appropriate, to your textbook readings and any other sources you may use, including websites. You are also expected to reply to your classmates' posts in a respectful, professional, and courteous manner. You may, of course, post questions asking for clarification or further elucidation on a topic.
You are required to complete four key activities in Modules 1, 3, and 5 of the course:
In Module 1, you will complete two evaluation activities, one concerning a hardware purchase of laptops or PCs for your school or district, the other focusing on an instructional software product already owned by your school or district. Both activities involve completing an evaluation form and writing a 1- to 2-page conclusion of your findings. See Module 1 for the activity details, and consult the Course Calendar for due dates.
Module 3 concludes with a short activity asking you to describe five web-based applications used in the classroom and their potential for improving student learning. See Module 3 for the activity details, and consult the Course Calendar for due dates.
In Module 5, you will critique the technology plan for your school district (or one of a district you research on the Web) in terms of the four Cs of planning. See Module 5 for the activity details, and consult the Course Calendar for due dates.
You are required to complete two software projects in Module 4 of the course. The first entails creating a spreadsheet in Excel containing budget information, grades, demographics, or other statistical data. The other is to create a database using Access that contains information about students, teachers, courses, or inventory (to name a few possibilities). See Module 4 for the activity details, and consult the Course Calendar for due dates.
Your final project in the course is to design a staff development program for teachers in your school or district that aligns with your school's or district's vision, goals, and technology plans. This staff development program constitutes a principal artifact for your portfolio. See Module 6 for the activity details, and consult the Course Calendar for due dates.
The principal artifact for this course is the staff development project from Module 6. Accompanying the artifact is a reflective narrative that describes the process and how the artifact meets specific standards and prepares you for school leadership.
Upload your artifact to your electronic portfolio, and be certain to indicate its alignment to the applicable ISLLC standards.
Your grade in the course will be determined as follows:
All activities will receive a numerical grade of 0–100. You will receive a score of 0 for any work not submitted. Your final grade in the course will be a letter grade. Letter grade equivalents for numerical grades are as follows:
To receive credit for the course, you must earn a letter grade of C or higher on the weighted average of all assigned course work (e.g., assignments, discussion postings, projects). Graduate students must maintain a B average overall to remain in good academic standing.
To succeed in this course, take the following first steps:
Consider the following study tips for success:
Thomas Edison State University is committed to maintaining academic quality, excellence, and honesty. The University expects all members of its community to share the commitment to academic integrity, an essential component of a quality academic experience.
Students at Thomas Edison State University are expected to exhibit the highest level of academic citizenship. In particular, students are expected to read and follow all policies, procedures, and program information guidelines contained in publications; pursue their learning goals with honesty and integrity; demonstrate that they are progressing satisfactorily and in a timely fashion by meeting course deadlines and following outlined procedures; observe a code of mutual respect in dealing with mentors, staff, and other students; behave in a manner consistent with the standards and codes of the profession in which they are practicing; keep official records updated regarding changes in name, address, telephone number, or e-mail address; and meet financial obligations in a timely manner. Students not practicing good academic citizenship may be subject to disciplinary action including suspension, dismissal, or financial holds on records.
All members of the University community are responsible for reviewing the Academic Code of Conduct Policy in the University Catalog and online at www.tesu.edu.
Thomas Edison State University expects all of its students to approach their education with academic integrity—the pursuit of scholarly activity free from fraud and deception. All mentors and administrative staff members at the University insist on strict standards of academic honesty in all courses. Academic dishonesty undermines this objective. Academic dishonesty can take the following forms:
Thomas Edison State University is committed to helping students understand the seriousness of plagiarism, which is defined as using the work and ideas of others without proper citation. The University takes a strong stance against plagiarism, and students found to be plagiarizing are subject to discipline under the academic code of conduct policy.
If you copy phrases, sentences, paragraphs, or whole documents word-for-word—or if you paraphrase by changing a word here and there—without identifying the author, or without identifying it as a direct quote, then you are plagiarizing. Please keep in mind that this type of identification applies to Internet sources as well as to print-based sources. Copying and pasting from the Internet, without using quotation marks and without acknowledging sources, constitutes plagiarism. (For information about how to cite Internet sources, see Online Student Handbook > Academic Standards > Citing Sources.)
Accidentally copying the words and ideas of another writer does not excuse the charge of plagiarism. It is easy to jot down notes and ideas from many sources and then write your own paper without knowing which words are your own and which are someone else’s. It is more difficult to keep track of each and every source. However, the conscientious writer who wishes to avoid plagiarizing never fails to keep careful track of sources.
Always be aware that if you write without acknowledging the sources of your ideas, you run the risk of being charged with plagiarism.
Clearly, plagiarism, no matter the degree of intent to deceive, defeats the purpose of education. If you plagiarize deliberately, you are not educating yourself, and you are wasting your time on courses meant to improve your skills. If you plagiarize through carelessness, you are deceiving yourself.
For examples of unintentional plagiarism, advice on when to quote and when to paraphrase, and information about writing assistance and originality report checking, click the links provided below.
Examples of Unintentional Plagiarism
When to Quote and When to Paraphrase
Writing Assistance at Smarthinking
Originality Report Checking at Turnitin
Acts of both intentional and unintentional plagiarism violate the Academic Code of Conduct.
If an incident of plagiarism is an isolated minor oversight or an obvious result of ignorance of proper citation requirements, the mentor may handle the matter as a learning exercise. Appropriate consequences may include the completion of tutorials, assignment rewrites, or any other reasonable learning tool in addition to a lower grade for the assignment or course. The mentor will notify the student and appropriate dean of the consequence by e-mail.
If the plagiarism appears intentional and/or is more than an isolated incident, the mentor will refer the matter to the appropriate dean, who will gather information about the violation(s) from the mentor and student, as necessary. The dean will review the matter and notify the student in writing of the specifics of the charge and the sanction to be imposed.
Possible sanctions include:
Anderson, D. A. (2001). The internet and web design for teachers. New York: Longman.
Bitter, G., & Pierson, M. (1999). Using technology in the classroom. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Boettcher, J. (2000, August). Designing for learning: What is meaningful learning? Syllabus, 14(1), 54–56.
Boettcher, J., & Kumar, M. S. (2000, June). The other infrastructure: Distance education’s digital plant. Syllabus, 13(10), 14–22.
Brown, J. S. (2000, March/April). Growing up digital. Change, 32(2), 10–11.
Conyers, J. G., Kappel, T., & Rooney, J. (1999, February). How technology can transform a school. Educational Leadership, 56(5), 82–85.
Corley, T. (1998). Tapping into technology in rural communities. Educational Leadership, 55(8), 71–73.
Coulter, B. (2000, January). Making good technology choices. Principal, 79(3), 18–21.
Creighton, B. T. (2001). Schools and data: The educator's guide for using data to improve decision making. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press, Inc.
Deal, N. (1999, May). The cyber-quest: A tool to assess educational resources on the internet. THE Journal, 26(10), 50–54.
Dede, C. (Ed.). (1998). Learning with technology: ASCD yearbook, 1998. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Drier, H. S., Dawson, K. M., & Garofalo, J. (1999, February). Not your typical math class. Educational Leadership, 56(5), 21–25.
Epstein, S. (1999, February). Electronic textbooks: From paper to pixels. Syllabus, 12(6), 16–19.
Freeman, L. (1999, January). Selling parents on technology. Principal, 78(3), 45–46.
Gregory, H. G., & Kuzmich, L. (2004). Data-driven differentiation in the standards-based classroom. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin Press, Inc.
Hawkes, M., & Cambre, M. (2000, August). The cost factor: When is interactive distance technology justifiable. THE Journal, 28(1), 26–32.
Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (2000). Millennials rising. New York: Vintage Books.
Isernhagen, J. D. (1999, August). Technology: A major catalyst for increasing learning. THE Journal, 27(1), 30–38.
Karelis, C. (1999, February). Education technology and cost control: Four models. Syllabus, 12(6), 20–28.
Latham, A. S. (1999, February). Computers and achievement. Educational Leadership, 56(5), 87–88.
Leamon, P. (1999, February). Apples and arias in the language lab. Educational Leadership, 56(5), 28–31.
Maurer, M. M., & Davidson, G. (1999, February). Technology, children, and the power of the heart. Kappan, 80(6), 458–460.
McQueen, T. F., & Fleck, R. A., Jr. (1999, June). An evaluation of alternative technology-based instructional formats. THE Journal, 26(11), 108–115.
Mergendoller, J. R. (2000, January). Technology and learning: A critical assessment. Principal, 79(3), 5–9.
National Research Council. 1999. Being fluent with information technology. Washington, DC: National Academies.
Oblinger, D. B. (2003, July/August). Gen-Xers and millennials: Understanding the new students. EDUCAUSE Review, 38(4).
Oblinger, D., & Oblinger, J. L. (Eds.). (2005). Educating the net generation. Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE.
Peregoy, R., & Kroder, S. (2000, August). Developing strategies for networked education. THE Journal, 28(1), 48–56.
Picciano, A. (2001). Distance learning: Making connections across virtual space and time. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
Roberts, P. A. (1997). What administrators need to know about technology. Principal, 76(3), 20.
Roblyer, M. D. (2003). Integrating educational technology into teaching (3rd ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
Rose, D. H., & Myers, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
Schulman, A. H., & Sims, R. L. (1999, June). Learning in an on-line format versus an in-class format: An experimental study. THE Journal, 26(11), 54–56.
Simkins, M. (1999, January). Building public support: Help from the Web. Principal, 78(3), 51.
Tapscott, D. (1999, February). Educating the net generation. Educational Leadership, 56(5), 7–11.
Thoman, E. (1999, February). Skills and strategies for media education. Educational Leadership, 56(5), 50–54.
Weinman, J., & Haag, P. (1999, February). Gender equity in cyberspace. Educational Leadership, 56(5) 44–49.
Copyright © 2017 by Thomas Edison State University. All rights reserved.