Syllabus for HUM-103
INTRODUCTION TO THE HUMANITIES III: MUSIC
Introduction to the Humanities III: Music discusses and helps students appreciate representative works of Western music in relation to their historical contexts. The course takes a three-pronged approach. First, it examines the historical, social, political, and religious environments that shaped the composers under study and their musical styles. Second, it focuses on certain representative works as examples of their times and as objects of art unto themselves. Finally, it develops listening skills and a musical vocabulary that allows students to isolate and identify certain types of musical phenomena. Students will emerge from the course with an expanded appreciation of the language of music. Course content is drawn from the Teaching Company's How to Listen to and Understand Great Music, by Dr. Robert Greenberg.
After completing this course, you should be able to:
You will need the following materials to do the work of the course. (There is no textbook for this course.)
The video programs are being offered via streaming video technology through the course Web site. See the Video Playlist in the top section of the course space.
Introduction to the Humanities III: Music is a three-credit online course, consisting of eleven modules. Modules include an overview, topics, learning objectives, study materials, and activities. Module titles are listed below.
For your formal work in the course, you are required to participate in online discussion forums, complete brief module papers, keep a reflective diary/blog, submit one concert review, and complete a final paper. See below for more details. In addition, the course includes ungraded self-tests designed to help you assess and build your music vocabulary.
Consult the Course Calendar for assignment due dates.
You are required to participate in ten graded discussion forums as well as an ungraded Introductions Forum. The online discussions are on a variety of topics associated with the course modules.
Located within the Evaluation Rubrics section of the course Web site is the rubric used to aid in the grading of online discussions.
You are required to complete twelve brief module papers. The papers are on a variety of topics associated with the course modules.
Located within the Evaluation Rubrics section of the course Web site is the rubric used to aid in the grading of module papers.
In this course you will be asked to reflect upon what you have learned in a diary or blog. You'll begin your reflective diary/personal blog in Module 1. Optimally, you will be writing this reflection piece as you watch the course videos.
You may fulfill this part of the course requirement in one of two ways:
Your diary/blog is an item that is required but not graded, and your mentor will need to know that you are keeping up with it. Therefore, you will be required to submit your reflective diary entries to your mentor weekly or to give your mentor access to your blog. In addition, you will use passages from this document in your final paper.
In Module 10 you will be required to write a review of a vocal or orchestral concert you have attended live, watched on television or listened to on the radio, or viewed via the Internet. Because you must complete this review by the end of Module 10, be sure make arrangements to attend the concert several weeks in advance of that time.
The description of the review in Module 10 gives guidelines for choosing a concert. Many communities and colleges/universities have free or low-cost concerts that are of a high quality and are well worth attending.
Located within the Evaluation Rubrics section of the course Web site is the rubric used to aid in the grading of the concert review.
There is no midterm or final examination in this course. A paper of 2000 to 2500 words acts as your final assessment and is worth 25 percent of your grade. You may begin work on this paper at any time during the course, but you must submit it by the last day of the semester.
The Final Paper will allow you to demonstrate your mastery of course objectives and concepts. You will use parts of your reflective/diary blog in your paper as well.
A full description of the paper is provided within the course. Located within the Evaluation Rubrics section of the course Web site is the rubric used to aid in the grading of the final paper.
You are required to submit the Final Paper in this course to Turnitin.com, an academic plagiarism prevention site, prior to submitting the paper within your course space. You will receive immediate written feedback from Turnitin regarding writing style as well as a plagiarism gauge with tips for proper citations. You then have the opportunity to edit your assignment with this feedback in mind and resubmit it to Turnitin for additional checking. Once you are satisfied with the paper, you are required to submit the Turnitin feedback (also known as the originality report) for the final version along with the paper itself within the course space.
Read carefully the documents at the following links, as they will give you instructions for this requirement:
Turnitin Student Manual
Details on accessing and using Turnitin may be found at the following link: Turnitin Details
This information can also be found within Using Turnitin for Assignments. You can locate this document in the topic list area of your course space.
Students please note: You have the option of submitting any of your assignments to Turnitin.com. Submit any additional assignments through the slots with the optional label. However, submitting other assignments is NOT a requirement and you should not submit originality reports for these assignments to your mentor.
Your grade in the course will be determined as follows:
All activities will receive a numerical grade of 0–100. You will receive a score of 0 for any work not submitted. Your final grade in the course will be a letter grade. Letter grade equivalents for numerical grades are as follows:
To receive credit for the course, you must earn a letter grade of C or better (for an area of study course) or D or better (for a course not in your area of study), based on the weighted average of all assigned course work (e.g., exams, assignments, discussion postings, etc.).
To succeed in this course, take the following first steps:
Consider the following study tips for success:
Thomas Edison State University is committed to maintaining academic quality, excellence, and honesty. The University expects all members of its community to share the commitment to academic integrity, an essential component of a quality academic experience.
Students at Thomas Edison State University are expected to exhibit the highest level of academic citizenship. In particular, students are expected to read and follow all policies, procedures, and program information guidelines contained in publications; pursue their learning goals with honesty and integrity; demonstrate that they are progressing satisfactorily and in a timely fashion by meeting course deadlines and following outlined procedures; observe a code of mutual respect in dealing with mentors, staff, and other students; behave in a manner consistent with the standards and codes of the profession in which they are practicing; keep official records updated regarding changes in name, address, telephone number, or e-mail address; and meet financial obligations in a timely manner. Students not practicing good academic citizenship may be subject to disciplinary action including suspension, dismissal, or financial holds on records.
All members of the University community are responsible for reviewing the Academic Code of Conduct Policy in the University Catalog and online at www.tesu.edu.
Thomas Edison State University expects all of its students to approach their education with academic integrity—the pursuit of scholarly activity free from fraud and deception. All mentors and administrative staff members at the University insist on strict standards of academic honesty in all courses. Academic dishonesty undermines this objective. Academic dishonesty can take the following forms:
Thomas Edison State University is committed to helping students understand the seriousness of plagiarism, which is defined as using the work and ideas of others without proper citation. The University takes a strong stance against plagiarism, and students found to be plagiarizing are subject to discipline under the academic code of conduct policy.
If you copy phrases, sentences, paragraphs, or whole documents word-for-word—or if you paraphrase by changing a word here and there—without identifying the author, or without identifying it as a direct quote, then you are plagiarizing. Please keep in mind that this type of identification applies to Internet sources as well as to print-based sources. Copying and pasting from the Internet, without using quotation marks and without acknowledging sources, constitutes plagiarism. (For information about how to cite Internet sources, see Online Student Handbook > Academic Standards > “Citing Sources.”)
Accidentally copying the words and ideas of another writer does not excuse the charge of plagiarism. It is easy to jot down notes and ideas from many sources and then write your own paper without knowing which words are your own and which are someone else’s. It is more difficult to keep track of each and every source. However, the conscientious writer who wishes to avoid plagiarizing never fails to keep careful track of sources.
Always be aware that if you write without acknowledging the sources of your ideas, you run the risk of being charged with plagiarism.
Clearly, plagiarism, no matter the degree of intent to deceive, defeats the purpose of education. If you plagiarize deliberately, you are not educating yourself, and you are wasting your time on courses meant to improve your skills. If you plagiarize through carelessness, you are deceiving yourself.
For examples of unintentional plagiarism, advice on when to quote and when to paraphrase, and information about writing assistance and originality report checking, click the links provided below.
Examples of Unintentional Plagiarism
When to Quote and When to Paraphrase
Writing Assistance at Smarthinking
Originality Report Checking at Turnitin
Acts of both intentional and unintentional plagiarism violate the Academic Code of Conduct.
If an incident of plagiarism is an isolated minor oversight or an obvious result of ignorance of proper citation requirements, the mentor may handle the matter as a learning exercise. Appropriate consequences may include the completion of tutorials, assignment rewrites, or any other reasonable learning tool in addition to a lower grade for the assignment or course. The mentor will notify the student and appropriate dean of the consequence by e-mail.
If the plagiarism appears intentional and/or is more than an isolated incident, the mentor will refer the matter to the appropriate dean, who will gather information about the violation(s) from the mentor and student, as necessary. The dean will review the matter and notify the student in writing of the specifics of the charge and the sanction to be imposed.
Possible sanctions include:
Copyright © 2016 by Thomas Edison State University. All rights reserved.