Syllabus for RPT-495
RADIATION PROTECTION/HEALTH PHYSICS CAPSTONE
Radiation Protection/Health Physics Capstone is an in-depth, student-centered activity that requires the integration of theory and practical experience in the field of radiation protection/health physics technology. You will apply the skills and techniques you have learned to a specific project. The project will identify a real-world radiation protection/health physics technical problem, issue, event, developing technology, or case study. You will conduct research by exploring, evaluating, and formulating a solution in a final paper. On successful completion of the course, you will demonstrate having met the learning outcomes of the NET/Radiation Protection degree program.
Prerequisite: RPT-490, Radiation Protection/Health Physics Assessment/Career Planning
After completing this course, you should be able to:
CO1 Apply Thomas Edison State University and ETAC-ABET student outcomes to radiation protection/health physics technology.
CO2 Identify a real-world radiation protection/health physics technical problem, issue, event, or developing technology.
CO3 Interpret radiation protection/health physics technology literature.
CO4 Outline a solution for a radiation protection/health physics technology issue by integrating theory, practical experience, and industry standards.
CO5 Participate in team formation and interaction.
CO6 Prepare and present an oral presentation.
CO7 Compose a research project.
CO8 Evaluate team member participation.
There are no textbooks required for this course.
Internet resources are included in each module for recommended readings and points to start web searches for supporting information.
Radiation Technology/Health Physics Capstone (RPT-495) is four-credit, online course consisting of five modules and a capstone project. Modules include an overview, topics, learning objectives, study materials, and activities. Module titles are listed below.
Course objectives covered in this module: 1
Course objectives covered in this module: 2, 3, and 5
Course objectives covered in this module: 1, 3, and 4
Course objectives covered in this module: 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8
Course objectives covered in this module: 6 and 8
For your formal work in the course, you are required to participate in three graded discussion forums and a series of ongoing group discussions related to the capstone project, complete five written assignments, and submit a capstone project.
For the capstone project, you and your team are required to submit your final project paper and complete student group evaluations.
Consult the Course Calendar for due dates. The Course Calendar provides dates to start each module and complete each assignment. It is important to complete each assignment before or by the due date to attain full credit. To stay current with all your assignments, maintain a copy of the Course Calendar with the week-by-week dates on it. Submitting assignments late adversely impacts your grades.
This course requires you to participate in three graded discussion forums. There is an ungraded but required Introductions Forum in Module 1 and an ungraded but required team selection forum in Module 2.
Deadlines for posting discussion threads are given in the Course Calendar. For posting guidelines and additional help with discussion forums, please see the Online Student Handbook located within the General Information section of the course website.
You are required to complete five written assignments in preparation for the final capstone project paper. These include topic selection and a problem statement, a bibliography, a project paper outline, a progress report, and oral presentation evaluations.
Before submitting your first assignment, check with your mentor to determine whether your word processing software is compatible with your mentor's software. If so, you can submit your work as you prepared it. If not, save your assignment as a rich-text (.rtf) file, using the Save As command of your software program. Rich text retains basic formatting and can be read by any other word processing program.
See the Online Student Handbook for additional help regarding preparing and submitting assignments located within the General Information section of the course website.
You are required to complete a final project as a group for this capstone course. The ability to work effectively in a team is one of the program outcomes that each student must demonstrate. This course requires students to form a group/team and work collaboratively to complete the capstone project. The five group discussion forums (one each in Modules 2, 3, and 5, and two in Module 4) provide you and your fellow team members an online space to discuss, share, critique, and elaborate among yourselves. It is also an online space for you to demonstrate your group work together to complete your group/team’s capstone project paper.
Your final project includes seven steps: (1) team selection, (2) topic selection and problem statement, (3) bibliography, (4) capstone project paper outline, (5) progress report, (6) oral presentations and evaluations, and (7) the completed capstone project paper. You are also required to post comments on other students' oral presentations on discussion forums.
As part of your final paper grade, you are also required to rate your team members' efforts in completing your final research paper. This will be an anonymous peer evaluation that requires you to download and complete a group evaluation form. The mentor will average your peers' ratings, which counts for 30 percent of your individual final paper grade. The mentor's grading of your team's final paper counts for 70 percent of your individual final paper grade.
For your benefit in successfully completing the RPT-495 capstone course, please keep the following key points in mind.
Examples: Use (SO 4) or (SO 12) in the superscript font (SO 4 or SO 12) to indicate where those Student Outcomes are covered in the paper. In most cases it will be obvious within the context of the report where to reference the associated outcome. The bottom line is that all SOs must be referenced in the final paper. However, in some cases it may seem odd to include text in the body of the paper to address a specific SO. Examples and suggestions follow.
It is imperative that each student complete all assignments of the course, including discussion forums and written assignments. If an individual does not submit an assignment, he or she will not receive a passing grade for the course. Completion of all assignments is necessary for mentors to evaluate your performance in all Student Outcomes designated for this course.
A sample final project paper is provided in the Course Documents folder (see RPT-495-Example Capstone Project Paper with Comments.)
Your grade in the course will be determined using the Student Outcome and rubrics provided throughout this course. Ensure that you review each element of the rubrics to understand the several criteria and details that will be used to assess your final grades.
Key elements of the course that will be used to determine your final grade are as follows.
Overall course evaluation will be based on the 12 Student Outcomes of the “Nuclear Engineering Technology with Emphasis in Radiation Protection” program, listed below. Each student will be evaluated on each Student Outcome based on the quality, quantity, participation, and responses they employ to satisfy the specific course objectives, assignments, and the final capstone project.
All activities will receive a numerical grade of 0–100. You will receive a score of 0 for any work not submitted. Your final grade in the course will be a letter grade. Letter grade equivalents for numerical grades are as follows:
A | = | 93–100 | C+ | = | 78–79 | |
A– | = | 90–92 | C | = | 73–77 | |
B+ | = | 88–89 | C– | = | 70–72 | |
B | = | 83–87 | D | = | 60–69 | |
B– | = | 80–82 | F | = | Below 60 |
To receive credit for the course, you must earn a letter grade of C or better (for an area of study course) or D or better (for a course not in your area of study), based on the weighted average of all assigned course work (e.g., exams, assignments, discussion postings).
To succeed in this course, take the following first steps:
Consider the following study tips for success:
Thomas Edison State University is committed to maintaining academic quality, excellence, and honesty. The University expects all members of its community to share the commitment to academic integrity, an essential component of a quality academic experience.
Students at Thomas Edison State University are expected to exhibit the highest level of academic citizenship. In particular, students are expected to read and follow all policies, procedures, and program information guidelines contained in publications; pursue their learning goals with honesty and integrity; demonstrate that they are progressing satisfactorily and in a timely fashion by meeting course deadlines and following outlined procedures; observe a code of mutual respect in dealing with mentors, staff, and other students; behave in a manner consistent with the standards and codes of the profession in which they are practicing; keep official records updated regarding changes in name, address, telephone number, or e-mail address; and meet financial obligations in a timely manner. Students not practicing good academic citizenship may be subject to disciplinary action including suspension, dismissal, or financial holds on records.
All members of the University community are responsible for reviewing the Academic Code of Conduct Policy in the University Catalog and online at www.tesu.edu.
Thomas Edison State University expects all of its students to approach their education with academic integrity—the pursuit of scholarly activity free from fraud and deception. All mentors and administrative staff members at the University insist on strict standards of academic honesty in all courses. Academic dishonesty undermines this objective. Academic dishonesty can take the following forms:
Thomas Edison State University is committed to helping students understand the seriousness of plagiarism, which is defined as using the work and ideas of others without proper citation. The University takes a strong stance against plagiarism, and students found to be plagiarizing are subject to discipline under the academic code of conduct policy.
If you copy phrases, sentences, paragraphs, or whole documents word-for-word—or if you paraphrase by changing a word here and there—without identifying the author, or without identifying it as a direct quote, then you are plagiarizing. Please keep in mind that this type of identification applies to Internet sources as well as to print-based sources. Copying and pasting from the Internet, without using quotation marks and without acknowledging sources, constitutes plagiarism. (For information about how to cite Internet sources, see Online Student Handbook > Academic Standards > Citing Sources.)
Accidentally copying the words and ideas of another writer does not excuse the charge of plagiarism. It is easy to jot down notes and ideas from many sources and then write your own paper without knowing which words are your own and which are someone else’s. It is more difficult to keep track of each and every source. However, the conscientious writer who wishes to avoid plagiarizing never fails to keep careful track of sources.
Always be aware that if you write without acknowledging the sources of your ideas, you run the risk of being charged with plagiarism.
Clearly, plagiarism, no matter the degree of intent to deceive, defeats the purpose of education. If you plagiarize deliberately, you are not educating yourself, and you are wasting your time on courses meant to improve your skills. If you plagiarize through carelessness, you are deceiving yourself.
For examples of unintentional plagiarism, advice on when to quote and when to paraphrase, and information about writing assistance and originality report checking, click the links provided below.
Examples of Unintentional Plagiarism
When to Quote and When to Paraphrase
Writing Assistance at Smarthinking
Originality Report Checking at Turnitin
Acts of both intentional and unintentional plagiarism violate the Academic Code of Conduct.
If an incident of plagiarism is an isolated minor oversight or an obvious result of ignorance of proper citation requirements, the mentor may handle the matter as a learning exercise. Appropriate consequences may include the completion of tutorials, assignment rewrites, or any other reasonable learning tool in addition to a lower grade for the assignment or course. The mentor will notify the student and appropriate dean of the consequence by e-mail.
If the plagiarism appears intentional and/or is more than an isolated incident, the mentor will refer the matter to the appropriate dean, who will gather information about the violation(s) from the mentor and student, as necessary. The dean will review the matter and notify the student in writing of the specifics of the charge and the sanction to be imposed.
Possible sanctions include:
Copyright © 2016 by Thomas Edison State University. All rights reserved.
